Hey, just giving you a headsup. I see that you have been working on making all of our nav boxes similar to what we were using for A New Beginning. That's fine, but something about it seemed off to me. And then I realized.. it was because everything is not centered. Maybe that's just my OCD talking, but it looks crazy ugly and weird to me when the list isn't centered. >.> Like.. all smooshed together and just.. weird looking. >w< The template itself is nice, just not the way the list was presented.
So I did some spacing and centering to the AP nav box as an example. Just if you do see it on a nav box and not sure why its there.
P.S. On your marriage candidates chart, you have Wizard down for ToT and AP... but he's only in AP and isn't in ToT at all. Just thought I'd point that out. =P
It looks good, and I'll keep it in mind for future edits.
..and yea I know Wizard only in AP but there no guys I rely liked in ToT lol
At the rate there coming out with new games for systems not listed in the top navi in the future you may need to replace "Games by System" with something like "others" or even maybe rethink how its organized all tougher, maybe have it more like a timeline rather then by system but that's a topic for another day for now its looking good
Any reason why you keep deleting SoS' characters appearances? They are there for easier navigation for characters that have multiple appearances in the series and as anticipation in case they appear in future games. Even if most of them only appear in one game so far, I see no reason why it needs to be removed. It gives information that those characters are exclusive to the game they appear in.
If the link points to the same page, e.g. Melanie's SoS page links back to itself, simply remove the link and bold the SoS text so it works like navigation system.
It is also by the name of page itself has: Melanie (SoS)
But please don't get me wrong! I really like the navigation system. It works well when characters are in multible games and it can always be added in if character show up again. But again it is rather redundant to have it on pages where characters only have a single appearance.
Since you were the one who put it in the category, could you explain what could be done to clean it up? Personally, I was thinking of adding the proper place where they can be grown in the public fields on the Public Fields Page. I thought it would be neater that way and wouldn't mess up the chart so much.
i was still working on that page a little bit It could use some more info not sure what elce to add - that said I think adding lists on the Public Fields Page of what can be grown there is a great idea.
I'm thinking of making more columns like that page so we can make the page more compact. If you want to put more information like where the crops can be grown, etc, it's best to put it on a single page, side-by-side, so people only needs to look at that page to find all information they need about crop-growing.
Well, it was my original plan to put where the crops are better grown on a seperate page in the first place, since I figured it may look a bit cluttered. It's not a bad idea, though. I can give it a whirl while I'm moving the "where if can grow" portion over. If I mess it up, sorry, ha ha.
I was literally ready to come here and ask why we would need for the Silk Country to have it's own sub-page but HOLY GOODNESS I can see why. I apologize in advance for even questioning that smart decision. But good golly Miss Molly, HOW FAR ARE YOU IN SOS? D: